prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
master's thesis
Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku
diplomski rad
2016. urn:nbn:hr:132:360498
Bogdan, Marina
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
Chair of Civil Law

Cite this document

Bogdan, M. (2016). Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad (Master's thesis). Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:360498

Bogdan, Marina. "Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:360498

Bogdan, Marina. "Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:360498

Bogdan, M. (2016). 'Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, accessed 12 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:360498

Bogdan M. Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad [Master's thesis]. Osijek: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek; 2016 [cited 2024 November 12] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:360498

M. Bogdan, "Objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Law Osijek, Osijek, 2016. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:132:360498

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleObjektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku : diplomski rad
Title (english)Objectivity and impartiality of judges in civil procedure : diploma paper
AuthorMarina Bogdan
MentorZvonimir Jelinić (mentor)
Committee memberPaula Poretti (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberKatarina Knol Radoja (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberZvonimir Jelinić (član povjerenstva)
GranterJosip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Faculty of Law Osijek
(Chair of Civil Law)
Osijek
Defense date and country2016, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Civil Law and Civil Procedural Law
Abstract
Predmet ovog rada je objektivnost i nepristranost sudaca u parničnom postupku. Člankom 6. Europske konvencije o zaštiti ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda jamči se pravo na pošteno suđenje koje podrazumijeva suđenje u razumnom roku pred neovisnim i nepristranim sudom. Težište rada bit će na nepristranosti suda i sudaca jer je nepristranost, za razliku od neovisnosti, puno teže dokazati.Razradu započinjem tumačenjem razlike između pojma neovisnosti i pojma nepristranosti. Zaključujem da se ne radi o dvije istoznačnice, nego o dva različita ali međusobno povezana koncepta koji zajedno tvore jedno od temeljnih ljudskih procesnih prava.Prilikom utvrđivanja postojanja (ne)pristranosti razlikujemo dva kriterija, subjektivni i objektivni. Subjektivni kriterij zahtijeva dokaze koji upućuju na konkretnu pristranost članova tijela koje odlučuje. Objektivnim kriterijem treba utvrditi je li sud pružio jamstvo kojim se isključuje svaka opravdana sumnja u njegovu nepristranostOvaj rad prati izričaj unutarnjih propisa koji reguliraju nepristranost suda, no i međunarodnih dokumenata koji su na snazi u RH te predstavljaju izvor prava. Neki od njih su Ustav RH, Zakon o sudovima, Zakon o parničnom postupku te Europska konvencija o zaštiti ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda kao najvažniji međunarodni izvor.Važnu ulogu u temi i radu općenito ima usporedba prakse Ustavnog suda s praksom Europskog suda za ljudska prava. Odlučujući o nepristranosti sudova USRH vezan je kako Europskom konvencijom o zaštiti ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda tako i praksom ESLJP. No USRH ima određenu slobodu, a ta sloboda mu dopušta vlastito pravno shvaćanje EKLJP koje u nekim slučajevima može biti različito od pravnog shvaćanja ESLJP.Zadnja cjelina posvećena je instrumentima koji osiguravaju nepristranost sudaca i sudova. Neki od njih su institut izuzeća sudaca propisan Zakonom o parničnom postupku i Kodeks sudačke etike koji sadrži temeljna načela na temelju kojih suci moraju djelovati. Važnu ulogu ima i Državno sudbeno vijeće kao neovisno i nepristrano tijelo državne sudbene vlasti.
Abstract (english)
This paper deals with objectivity and impartiality of judges in civil procedure. Article 6. of the European Convention on Human Rights proclaimes right to a fair trial. It contains fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal. The focus of work will be on impartiality because it is more difficult to prove a lack of impartiality than it is to prove a lack of independence.Furthermore, this paper is trying to make a difference between impartiality and independence. I therefore conclude they are not synonyms. These words have different meaning, but they are in correlation. Together they form one of fundamental human rights.When we try to prove a lack of impartiality, we differ two criteria: subjective and objective. Subjective criteria requires that no member of the tribunal should hold any personal prejudice or bias. Objective criteria means that the court must offer guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in its respect.Since this paper is also dealing with special focus on internal regulations and also international documents which are important for this subject, I mention The Croatian Constitution, Law on Civil Procedure and European Convention on Human Rights.It is important to compare practise of the Constitutional Court with practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The Constitutional Court is obligated to respect European Convention on Human Rights and practice of the European Court of Human Rights while deciding about lack of impartiality. The Constitutional Court is allowed to interpret European Convention in its own way, which is sometimes different than the way of European Court does it.The last chapter is dealing with instruments which are important for securing impartiality of judges. Institute of exemption of judges and Code of Judicial Ethics are some of them. There is also State Judicial Council as independent and impartial judicial authority.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:132:360498
Study programmeTitle: Law
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2017-01-19 11:13:07