Title Odmjeravanje kazne u kaznenom pravu Bosne i Hercegovine : završni rad
Title (english) Sentence deliberation in the criminal law of Bosnia and Hercegovina
Author Alen Lukač
Mentor Igor Vuletić (mentor)
Granter Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek Faculty of Law Osijek (Chair of Criminal Law) Osijek
Defense date and country 2016, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline SOCIAL SCIENCES Law Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Criminology and Victimology
Abstract Odmjeravanje kazne, kao dio sudskoga postupanja koje slijedi nakon utvrđivanja krivnje počinitelja, od iznimne je važnosti, a sa aspekta kaznene politike ima i pretežniji interes u odnosu na sve druge elemente sudskog postupanja, jer se odmjeravanjem kazne izravno oblikuje kaznena politika određene države. Problem ispravnog i pravičnog izbora prave vrste i visine kaznenopravne sankcije počinitelju kaznenog djela predstavlja iznimno složeni intelektualni i misaoni postupak namijenjen sudovima, a taj postupak ima svoja profilirana pravila. Na temelju brojnih navedenih slučajeva sudske prakse u Bosni i Hercegovini u radu se ukazuje na problematiku nedovoljnog praćenja razvoja instituta odmjeravanja kazne, te činjenicu da se sudska praksa i dalje drži uobičajenih šematiziranih pravila prilikom individualizacije kazne, koje su vrlo često u oprečnosti i sa samim tekstom zakona. Iz izloženoga se može zaključiti da jedan od glavnih problema u praktičnoj primjeni instituta odmjeravanja kazne predstavlja stereotipno, šablonsko, površno i nestručno ispitivanje i ocjenjivanje osobe počinitelja, pa se se stječe dojam da se izbor vrste i visine kaznenopravne sankcije vrši najčešće i dalje prema intuitivnim i vrlo nesigurnim kriterijima. Naime, odsustvo ustaljenih kriterija, neujednačenost i različitost pri izboru vrste i visine kazne, neumitno dovodi i do izricanje blagih kazni i konstantnog daljnjeg ublažavanja od strane sudova u odnosu prema propisanim okvirima, što opet ukazuje na opću tendenciju ublažavanja oštrice kaznenog prava. Stoga, osnovna svrha rada jeste ukazivanje na važnost temeljitijeg sudskog preispitivanja okolnosti od važnosti za odmjeravanje kazne, usklađivanja stajališta sudske prakse u pogledu tumačenja svake od istih okolnosti, a sve u cilju iznjedravanja jednoznačne interpretacije pojedinih okolnosti od značaja za odmjeravanja kazne, što zasigurno u konačnici može samo doprinositi postizanju pravne sigurnosti.
Abstract (english) Sentence deliberation, as a part of a legal proceeding that follows establishing of guilt of the perpetrator, has great importance, and, from the viewpoint of punitive policy, its importance exceeds importance of all other elements of a legal proceeding, because this element directly gives form to the punitive policy of a country. A correct and just choice of the kind and the level of a criminal law sanction for a perpetrator of a crime is an exceptionally complex intelectual procedure from the domain of courts of law, and that procedure has its clearly delineated rules. On the basis of numerous cases from the legal practice in Bosnia and Hercegovina adduced in this paper, it points out the problem of insufficient keeping in touch with the evolution of sentence deliberation and the fact that legal practice continues to adhere to habitual, simplified rules in meting out the punishments, that are very often in contradiction with the very letter of the law. The conclusion that can be drawn from the presented paper is that a stereotypical, automatic, superficial and inexpert interrogation and assessment of the person of the perpetrator is one of the greatest problems in applying rules for sentencing and that one can't help feeling that the choice of the kind and the level of the criminal law sanction is still made mostly on the basis of intuitive and very uncertain criteria. The inevitable consequence of the absence of settled criteria, lack of uniformity and differences in choosing the kind and the severitiy of penalty is dispensing some lenient punishments and constant relaxing the boundaries set by writtten laws, that indicates the general tendency toward taking off the edge of the criminal law. Therefore, the main intention of this paper is pointing out the importance of a more thorough investigation of the circumstances pertinent to sentence deliberation and alignment of the interpretation of each of them, with the goal of producing unambiguous interpretation of the circumstances important for determining a sentence, that can only help in achieving the higher level of legal certainty.
Keywords
Odmjeravanje kazne
Svrha kažnjavanja
Olakotne i otegotne okolnosti
Zabrana dvostrukog vrednovanja okolnosti važnih za odmjeravanje kazne
Alternativne kaznenopravne sankcije
Keywords (english)
Sentencing
purpose of punishment
mitigating and aggravating circumstances
ban of different valuation of the circumstances relevant to setting the penalty
alternative criminal law sanctions
Language croatian
URN:NBN urn:nbn:hr:132:942497
Study programme Title: POSTGRADUATE SPECIALIST STUDY PROGRAMME OF CRIMINAL LAW Study programme type: university Study level: postgraduate specialist Academic / professional title: sveučilišni/a specijalist/specijalistica kaznenog prava (sveučilišni/a specijalist/specijalistica kaznenog prava)
Type of resource Text
File origin Born digital
Access conditions Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of use
Created on 2017-07-10 09:51:23