| Abstract | Predmet sljedećeg rada je obvezno mirenje. Ono je jedan od načina alternativnog rješavanja sporova. Rad je podijeljen na više cjelina u kojima se pobliže objašnjava što je mirenje, koje su vrste mirenja, koja je uloga izmiritelja u samom postupku mirenja. Želi se naglasiti kako je to postupak u kojem stranke same odlučuju o svojem pravnom problemu te u kojem smjeru će teći postupak. Iščitavajući pravne propise koji su na snazi u Republici Hrvatskoj može se zaključiti kako u današnje vrijeme stranke zaista imaju mnogo načina na koji mogu riješiti pravni problem bez da se upuštaju u sudski postupak koji je dugotrajan, skup i prije svega stresan za sve njegove sudionike. S druge strane imamo postupak mirenja koji je ekonomičan i pristupačan svima da na humaniji način otklone nastalu pravnu situaciju, a često nakon sporazumnog rješavanja poslovnih razmirica stranke mogu nastaviti poslovati dalje. U našem pravnom sustavu mirenje je obvezno samo u nekim pravnim situacijama. Na primjer propisuje se prije pokretanja postupka radi razvoda braka te ostalih sudskih postupaka o ostvarivanju roditeljske skrbi i osobnih odnosa s djetetom, zatim u slučaju spora koji bi mogao dovesti do štrajka ili drugog oblika industrijske akcije te u sporovima u kojima je jedna od stranaka Republika Hrvatska. Kroz rad će se ukazati na prednosti mirenja te koja su to prava kojima stranke slobodno raspolažu. A slijedom toga navest će se situacije gdje mirenje nije obvezno, ali se preporuča zbog osjetljivih pitanja, male vrijednosti spora te gospodarskog interesa. Trom i preopterećen državni sudbeni aparat onemogućava napredak te čak unazađuje gospodarstvo. Zbog dinamičnosti na tržištu i svakodnevnih situacija koje zahtijevaju ažurno rješavanje, bilo da su u pitanju domaći sporovi ili prekogranični, mirenje i sklapanje nagodbe u kojoj svaka stranka u nekom dijelu popusti, a drugome traži nešto za uzvrat omogućavaju razvoj gospodarstva u pozitivnom smjeru te smanjivanju sudskih postupaka. Pristupanje problemu s istinskom namjerom i željom da ga se riješi je budućnost u kojoj možemo napredovati. |
| Abstract (english) | The subject matter of the present paper is mandatory mediation. It is one of the routes to an alternative dispute solving. The paper is divided into several parts with further explanations on what mediation is, which kinds of mediation exist, what is the role of the mediator in the mediation process. The paper aims to accentuate that, in such a process, it is the parties themselves that decide on their legal dispute and the direction the process will take. After studying legal regulations in effect in the Republic of Croatia, it can be concluded that, nowadays, parties have many ways of legal dispute solving, without initiating legal proceedings that are time and money consuming and, above all, stressful for their participants. On the other hand, there is a mediation process, which is economical and accessible to all, as well as designed as a more humane way of solving the existing legal situation; often, after an agreed settlement of business disputes, parties can continue with their business operations. In our legal system, mediation is mandatory only in some legal situations. It is, thus, stipulated to initiate a mediation process before initiating legal proceedings in case of a divorce and similar legal processes involving rights to parental care and personal relationships with a child, in case of disputes that could potentially lead to strikes or other forms of industrial action, as well as in disputes having the Republic of Croatia as one of the parties. This paper aims at indicating the advantages of mediation and rights of which both parties freely dispose. Furthermore, the paper brings a list of situations in which mediation is not mandatory, but it is to be recommended due to the sensitivity of issues, low value of the dispute, and economic interests. Sluggish and overloaded national legal apparatus obstructs the progress and even puts back economy. Due to the market dynamics and day-to-day situations requiring prompt solutions – no matter whether in case of national or cross-border disputes – mediation and settlement based on concessions of each party in some things and receiving something in return in other things enable the economic growth in a positive direction, as well as diminish the number of law suits. Taking an approach to a problem with the intent and wish to solve it is the future towards which we can progress. |
